Svitlana NOVYTSKA.

ECOLOGICAL TOURISM OPPORTUNITIES IN THE PERSPECTIVE RLP “MALOPOLESKY”.

Opportunities for the development of eco-tourism in the perspective RLP “Malopolesky” this article describes. Ecological importance of the development of tourism within the boundaries of a promising regional landscape park “Malopolesky” to a more rational use of natural recreational resources, respect for the integrity of ecosystems, increasing environmental awareness, the interests of local residents substantiated. Create RLP ” Malopolesky ” can provide a significant variety of cycles ekoturistism occupation: cognitive (knowledge of the cultural, historical, ethnographic, natural objects of the territory), recreational (fishing, picking mushrooms, nuts, berries, herbs, boating), recreation (swimming in ponds, physical labor), and the constant change of impressions contact with nature in combination with low financial costs. Proposed area RLP “Malopolesky” maximum load of recreational terrain types RLP “Malopolesky” that is for park – 15.1 people./day/ha; forest – 7.6 people/day/ha; for not-forest – 5.6 people/day/ha, as well as potential capacity RLP recreational seasons.  Natural preconditions for the development of ecotourism within the RLP “Malopolesky” analyzed, namely climate, hydrographic network, flora and fauna. Functional recreation zoning RLP focuses. On which map create. A protected zone, stationary, controlled recreation area, as well as economy area highlighted. Create religion – pilgrimage tourist route RLP “Malopolesky” suggested. In the area of immediate availability RLP is home to about 3.5 thousand people. Thousands more visitors will Ternopil residents and autotourists from other settlements. Transport accessibility Park analyzed.

Keywords: eco-tourism, regional landscape park, functional areas, ecotourism business.

References:

  1. Vasilev Yu.S. Ispolzovanie vodoYomov i rek v tselyah rekreatsii / Yu.S. Vasilev, V.A. Kukushkin – L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1988. – 230 s.
  2. Gerasimov I.P. Natsionalnyie parki kak forma ispolzovaniya i organizatsii territorii dlya otdyiha i turizma / I.P. Gerasimov, V.S. Preobrazhenskiy // Izv. ANSSSR. Seriya Geografiya.- 1979. – #5 – S. 32-35.
  3. Get`man V. Rekreacijna diyal`nist` v regional`ny`x landshaftny`x parkax Ukrayiny` / V. Get`man // Geografiya ta osnovy` ekonomiky` v shkoli. –2004. – # 1. – S. 35-41.
  4. Kucenko V. Strategiya formuvannya vy`sokotexnologichnogo tury`sts`kogo kompleksu Ukrayiny` /V. Kucenko // Krayeznavstvo. Geografiya. Tury`zm. # 12(593), berezen`, 2009. – S. 6-7.
  5. Metody`chni rekomendaciyi shhodo vy`znachennya maksy`mal`nogo rekreacijnogo navantazhennya na pry`rodni kompleksy` ta ob’yekty` u mezhax pry`rodno-zapovidnogo fondu Ukrayiny` za zonal`no-regional`ny`m rozpodilom / Texn. red. I.V. Solomaxa. – K.: V-vo Ukr. fitosociologichnogo centru, 2006. – 51 s.
  6. Svy`nko J.M. Nary`s pro pry`rodu Ternopil`s`koyi oblasti: geologichne my`nule, suchasny`j stan / J.M. Svy`nko. – Ternopil`: Navchal`na kny`ga – Bogdan, 2007. – 192s.

FULL TEXT:

PDF